Electromagnetic Spectrum Technology Determines Future War Winners

Starting from the problems of electromagnetic spectrum control in the US military battlefield and the advantages of electromagnetic spectrum, the current development of the new theory of electromagnetic spectrum warfare of the US military, the main policies and regulations, new equipment, and pre-research technologies are being analyzed. The basic concepts and tasks of the joint electromagnetic spectrum combat theory are analyzed. The main features of the development of the US military’s electromagnetic spectrum operations are discussed in terms of theoretical understanding, power architecture, operational applications, and equipment technology, among others, such as domain and positioning, major organizations, combat planning content, and methods of combat operations.

For a long time, in order to solve the A2/AD dilemma and achieve a new offset strategy, the U.S. has launched combat operations such as open space/air-sea warfare, cyber-centric warfare, distributed killing, multi-domain warfare, and mixed warfare. With new ideas, we constantly seek military advantages such as missile offensive and defense, cyber-electromagnetics, and multi-domain space. Today, the electromagnetic spectrum war has become the new darling of leading a new round of military theory and technological innovation. Researching and analyzing the status quo and characteristics of the development of the US military’s electromagnetic spectrum combat has important practical significance for our military’s success in defeating the enemy in the information battlefield.

1 Development of Electromagnetic Spectrum Warfare

In 1956, Admiral Sergei Gorschkov, the former Soviet naval commander, pointed out: "Who controls the electromagnetic spectrum, who will win the next war." Sixty years later, the electromagnetic spectrum has become one of the key battlefields of modern warfare. In order to compete for the advantages of the electromagnetic spectrum in the battlefield, the US military conducted in-depth explorations from combat theory to equipment technology and developed rapidly.

1.1 Evolution of theory

Electromagnetic spectrum control has a long history. In the early 1970s, Thomas H. Moorer, chairman of the US Senate Association, said that the winners of the Third World War will be those who can highly control and manage the electromagnetic spectrum. The United States "Old Ravens" Association first proposed the use of electromagnetic control (EMC) as the fourth component of the concept of electronic warfare. In 2009, Strategic Command launched the early concept of electromagnetic spectrum warfare (EMSW), and added tasks such as electromagnetic spectrum management (EMSM), electromagnetic spectrum control (EMSC), and electromagnetic battle control (EMBC) on the basis of electronic warfare [1]. In 2012, the Strategic Command established the Joint Electromagnetic Spectrum Control Center (JEMSCC) to achieve full integration of electronic warfare and electromagnetic spectrum management, and each of the units also established corresponding organizational coordination agencies and detachments [2]. In the same year, the US Navy proposed the concept of Electromagnetic Maneuver Warfare (EMMW) [3], and in March 2015 released the "21st Century Maritime Force Cooperation Strategy," which outlines the goals, components, technology projects, and implementation paths of the electromagnetic maneuver warfare [4]. In December 2015, Terry Halvorsen, chief information officer of the US Department of Defense, pointed out that the electromagnetic spectrum is expected to be considered as the sixth battlefield following land, sea, air, space, and cyberspace [5]; in the same month, the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments Defining Electromagnetic Waves: Regaining U.S. Dominance in the Electromagnetic Spectrum Field[6] The report proposes the concept of “low-zero-power” electromagnetic spectrum warfare, expounding concept ideas, trend features, capabilities and technical requirements and current obstacles, and presenting views, concepts, Procurement, technical, verification, etc. At the end of November 2016, the 53rd International Conference of the “Old Ravens” Association of the United States took the theme “Global Vision of Electromagnetic Spectrum Operations” as the theme to demonstrate the new concepts and technical achievements of electronic warfare, spectrum sensing and conflict resolution, and explored the electromagnetic spectrum operational environment. Policy regulations, equipment procurement, joint training and combat capabilities, etc. [7]. In January 2017, the new Secretary of Defense Ashton Carter signed the first "Electronic Warfare Strategy" document, officially establishing the electromagnetic spectrum as an independent operational domain and elaborating on how to conduct operations [8].

1.2 Policies and Orders

Strategic policies and military doctrines reflect the development of the US military’s combat theory. From 2006 to 2014, the US Department of Defense updated the "Electromagnetic Spectrum Strategy" to focus on advancing strategic objectives such as development of spectrum equipment, flexibility of spectrum operations, spectrum management, and improvement of policy response capabilities [9]; Strategic Command released in August 2010. Winning the 21st Century Economic and Security Advantage: Strategic Framework for Electromagnetic Spectrum Control, building an electromagnetic spectrum control system architecture from multiple perspectives including objectives, requirements, strategic development, etc. [10]; the Joint Venture Association has promulgated JP6-01 “Joint” in March 2012. “Electromagnetic Spectrum Management Action” joint publication [11], signed in December 2012 CJCSM3320.01C "Chairman's Handbook of Joint Electromagnetic Spectrum Management Operations in Electromagnetic Operation Environment" [12], issued CJCSI3320.01D "Joint Electromagnetic Spectrum" in January 2013 Operational Instructions [13] and CJCSM 3320.04 “Electronic Warfare Supporting Combined Electromagnetic Spectrum Operations” Manual [14]. In March 2015, the “Electromagnetic Spectrum Operational Joint Concept” document [15] was signed, which systematically stated that the Joint Forces launched electromagnetic spectrum combat operations. Strategic vision, organizational structure and functions, command and management relationships, plan formulation and operational implementation, operational integration and action synergy, and gradually Tactical, technical, and program (TTP) refinement of control, interference cancellation, spectrum management, and electronic warfare reprogramming, etc.; US Army released TRADOC P525-7-16, "The US Army's Future Modular Force Conceptual Capability in December 2007 Plan 2015-2024 - Electromagnetic Spectrum Operation Manual [16]. Field regulations FM6-02.70 "Army Electromagnetic Spectrum Operations" [17] were issued in May 2010. Field Manual FM3-38 "Network Electromagnetic Actions" was issued in January 2014. [18] In December 2015, the publication ATP6-02.70 "Electromagnetic Spectrum Management Combat Operations Skills" [19] was updated in February 2016, AR525-15 "Network electromagnetic action software reprogramming" provisions [20], the United States Air Force 2017 The update AFI10-703 "Integration of Electronic Warfare Reprogramming" [21] defines the scope of the concept of electromagnetic spectrum operations under the guidance of joint directives, in-depth description of institutions and responsibilities, operational architecture, planning and coordination control, task list and decision process, Action teams and management tools and DOTMLPF issues, and promote the integration of electromagnetic spectrum operations, electronic warfare and cyberspace warfare. In addition, Kevin D. Scott, Head of Development Department of the U.S. Joint Forces, signed the JDN3-16 "Joint Electromagnetic Spectrum Operation" summary in October 2016[22], and standardized terminology and operational framework standards for functional roles, organizations, and plan development. A procedural description of the operational implementation and evaluation was conducted in January and March 2013 by the HKSCC with the CJCSM3320.02D "Joint Spectrum Disturbance Mitigation Procedure", CJCSI3320.02F "Joint Spectrum Interference Cancellation" and 2014 Monthly CJCSI3320.02E-1 "Confidential Enhancement of Joint Spectrum Interference Cancellation Procedures" three major orders [23][24][25] are important operational support and become the latest guidance for the US military's electromagnetic spectrum warfare.

1.3 Equipment and Technology

Military technology leads and supports advanced operational concepts. To transform the concept of electromagnetic spectrum warfare from concept to capability, the U.S. military is striving to develop technological innovation and equipment research and development to develop new systems that are networked, dexterous, multi-functional, miniaturized, and adaptive.

On the spectrum management and control system[19][26], the US Department of Defense has developed and deployed the Allied Nations Joint Spectrum Management Planning Tool (CJSMPT) and the Global Electromagnetic Spectrum Information System (GEMSIS) since 2005, followed by the Spectrum XXI and the Modified Spectrum XXIO, Spectrum. Perception Management and Planning System (SSC-SSMPS), Spectrum Situational Sensing System (S2AS), Maritime Electromagnetic Spectrum Operational Action Project (AESOP), Joint Automatic Communication Electronic Action Instruction System (JACS), Host Country Global Online Spectrum Database, etc., with real-time spectrum Measurement and online analysis, spectrum planning and deduction and frequency allocation, electromagnetic interference analysis and conflict elimination, electromagnetic warfare environment modeling simulation, electromagnetic situation sharing and frequency efficiency evaluation, spectrum resource access and database functions and capabilities.

In combat equipment and technology projects [3][26][27], in 2011, the DARPA began to initiate behavioral learning adaptive electronic warfare (BLADE), adaptive radar confrontation (ARC), extreme radio frequency spectrum CommEx, Active Electronic Scan Array (AESA) technology, Near Zero-Power Radio Frequency and Sensor Operation (N-ZERO), under the conditions of the project, through the development of new technologies such as real-time evaluation of countermeasures, autonomous generation of measures, immediate feedback of effects, etc. Unknown waveform and behavioral electromagnetic spectrum threats Real-time tactical confrontation new capabilities; In 2010, the Air Force launched a Cognitive Jammer and HiPERDAC project based on Networked Software Defined Architecture (SDA) and passive RF PRIDE, SWEATER, and CHAMP (Eliminate High-Power Microwave Advanced Missiles) to develop active and passive target threat automatic recognition, real-time assessment and adaptive confrontation technologies and capabilities The US Navy conducts a maritime electronic warfare improvement (SEWIP-Block I/II/III) SLQ-32 shipboard electronic warfare system and ship signalling Equipment (SSEE), electromagnetic command and control (EMC2), integrated mast (InTop) shipborne antenna, next-generation jamming machine (NGJ) and other projects to improve real-time threat assessment and situational awareness, mission program modeling simulation, automatic distribution of electromagnetic spectrum , Combat Operations Analysis and other capabilities; the US Army launched the Electronic Warfare Planning and Management Tool (EWPMT) and Multi-Functional Electronic Warfare (MFEW), Defensive Electronic Assault (DEA) and Silencer Electronics scheduled for September 2016 Warfare and other systems enhance the electronic support for the perception of radio signals and the ability to send electronic signals that interfere with or deceive signals. Earlier this year, the Strategic Command Joint Electronic Warfare Center (JEWC) initiated research on new technologies that provide improved electromagnetic battle management capabilities for electromagnetic spectrum situational awareness and command and control, and plans to implement real-time strategy-based spectrum control and advanced electromagnetic battle sequences (EOB) within five years. ) Characterization and action plan modeling, simulation, analysis, and other capabilities and achieve 7-8 level of technology maturity [28]. Driven by cognitive EW and artificial intelligence technologies, DARPA launched the Radio Frequency Machine Learning System (RFMLS) and Spectrum Joint Challenge Program on August 11, 2017 to develop automatic identification and characterization of target signals from a large number of complex spectrum signals. New technology [29].

2 Joint Electromagnetic Spectrum Theory

The electromagnetic spectrum warfare is the latest theory of information warfare of the US military in the 21st century. As research and understanding continue to deepen, the U.S. military will gradually place new strategic ideas as tactics and tactical measures. In order to unify the battlefield electromagnetic spectrum utilization and control actions, the U.S. military issued a series of directives, regulations, regulations, and other documents to publish a summary of the JDN3-16 "Joint Electromagnetic Spectrum Operation" regulations, and standardized the operational concept, mission category, organization, and combat planning and implementation. Evaluation and so on.

2.1 Basic concepts

Electromagnetic Spectrum Operations (EMSO) is the conceptual starting point for the US military’s electromagnetic spectrum warfare theory. It is based on electronic warfare and spectrum management and is based on joint electromagnetic spectrum operations. The goal is to achieve electromagnetic spectrum advantages in electromagnetic operating environment (EMOE), involving spectrum management operations, joint electromagnetic spectrum operations (JEMSO) and joint electromagnetic spectrum. Management actions and other concepts. According to the US military regulations JP1-02 "Defense Ministry Military Terms Glossary" [30], JP6-01 "Joint Electromagnetic Spectrum Management Action", JDN3-16 "Joint Electromagnetic Spectrum Operations" and ATP6-02.70 "Electromagnetic Spectrum Management Combat Operations Skills" Joint electromagnetic spectrum operations are coordinated military operations conducted by two or more units to use, attack, protect and manage the electromagnetic operational environment. The electromagnetic spectrum management action refers to the interaction between the spectrum management, frequency allocation, host country coordination, policy compliance, and conflict resolution in the entire phase of military operations to jointly promote the planning, management, and implementation of operations within the electromagnetic operations environment. The relationship between various concepts and categories is shown in Figure 1.

Fig. 1 Diagram of related concepts of electromagnetic spectrum operations [19]

2.2 Task Domain Positioning

The U.S. military believes that the joint electromagnetic spectrum combat mission domain is composed of four-dimensional missions of electromagnetic spectrum utilization, management, attack, and protection. Among them, missions include signal intelligence gathering, distribution, and electronic warfare support. Management tasks include electromagnetic spectrum management and electromagnetic battle management. Missions have electronic attacks and navigation warfare, protection tasks have electronic protection and joint spectrum interference cancellation. The operational concept aims to operationally integrate the electromagnetic spectrum operations of the joint forces in the electromagnetic operating environment, establish key priorities, organize action coordination, and eliminate conflicts. Through the full integration of electromagnetic maneuvering schemes, strength and action to strengthen coordination and unification, the electromagnetic spectrum of the battlefield is realized. control. It plays a key role in the formation of joint operational capability in all operational areas, and has a profound impact on the joint forces' command and control, intelligence, firepower strikes, adjustment and mobility, protection, and maintenance of operational capabilities.

2.3 Organizational Framework

The organization of the joint electromagnetic spectrum operations is responsible for the formulation and publication of policy directives and operational guidelines for commanders and commanders, and for combat planning, operational implementation, coordination of operations, and operational evaluation. The person in charge of electromagnetic spectrum control assigned by the Joint Force Commander shall assume the overall responsibility for the joint electromagnetic spectrum operations. The Joint Electromagnetic Spectrum Operations Unit (JEMSOC) is the chief staff of the Joint Force, and the person in charge of electromagnetic spectrum control assigns a supervisor to direct the command. Each service set up an electromagnetic spectrum operations division, each of which administers an electromagnetic spectrum operational unit, and assumes the functions of integrated network operations, electronic warfare, and spectrum management operations. They are the Army’s electronic warfare officer’s network of electromagnetic action units and the Navy’s maritime operations. The operational center electromagnetic spectrum operational unit, the Air Force air operations center electronic warfare coordination unit, the Marine Corps Combat Development and Integration Command's cyberspace and electronic warfare coordination unit, and the Multinational Force Joint Staff Operations Department's contracted electronic warfare coordination unit. The Joint Electromagnetic Spectrum Operational Organization of the Joint Force is shown in Figure 2. The joint electromagnetic spectrum combat unit architecture is shown in Figure 3.

Figure 2 Electromagnetic Spectrum Operational Organization

Figure 3 Joint Electromagnetic Spectrum Operations Unit Architecture

2.4 Combat Planning Process

Joint electromagnetic spectrum combat planning is jointly completed by all levels of joint electromagnetic spectrum combat units. During task analysis, the combat plan development team develops a staff assessment plan to determine the electromagnetic spectrum support degree in the formulation and analysis of the action plan as a strategic basis for achieving the advantages of the electromagnetic spectrum; after the action plan is selected, joint electromagnetics are developed. The spectrum operations appendix describes mission tasks, priorities, policy strategies, process steps, and implementation procedures for the entire operational phase, establishing coordination measures, specific procedures, and engagement rules for the use of electromagnetic battle management and control systems in the joint operations domain; The Ministry submits its own electromagnetic spectrum operations plan and integrates it into this appendix. During the planning and implementation of the plan, the Joint Electromagnetic Spectrum Operations Unit strengthens the electromagnetic spectrum operations plans of each division and participates in the development of various divisions, establishment of priorities, establishment of operational integration and operational coordination, and the creation of an electromagnetic spectrum control plan. Then, the updated electromagnetic spectrum control plan is adjusted to start the joint electromagnetic spectrum combat implementation cycle to generate an electromagnetic spectrum control sequence that guides the use of the electromagnetic spectrum of the joint force. The combat planning process is shown in Figure 4.

Figure 4 Joint Electromagnetic Spectrum Combat Plan Development Process

2.5 Operational methods

The joint electromagnetic spectrum operations implementation process is a continuous cycle of planning, implementation and evaluation. The united electromagnetic spectrum combat unit completes the formulation of the electromagnetic spectrum control plan and the electromagnetic spectrum control sequence, and establishes the combat cycle for combat operations. After the approval of the person in charge of electromagnetic spectrum control, it publishes and organizes the implementation to each branch's combat unit and unit. The electromagnetic spectrum combat unit fully participates in the key combat flow of the joint force and adjusts the update plan and sequence in time according to the user needs of the subunits and the electromagnetic spectrum of the battlefield during the operation period to ensure that each electromagnetic spectrum control sequence is effectively generated and efficiently Released and executed. The basic processes are: Formulation and release of control plans, update of control plans for each division, preparation of operational plans, generation and distribution of control sequences, execution and adjustment of operational implementation plans and control sequences, and monitoring and guidance of operational processes. The operational implementation cycle is shown in Figure 5.

Figure 5 Joint Electromagnetic Spectrum Operational Implementation Cycle

3 Electromagnetic Spectrum Combat Development Characteristics

New military capabilities cannot be separated from the new system. As an operational concept that responds to new military challenges in the era of information networks, big data, and artificial intelligence, electromagnetic spectrum warfare has become a new direction for the development of the combat effectiveness of the US military. In order to deepen understanding and be efficient and practical, the U.S. military has pushed the new concept to the battlefield from many dimensions, including the development of policy directives, organization and force adjustment, equipment systems and new technology research and development.

3.1 Reinforce basic concepts and theoretical understanding based on policy directives, promote operational concepts and implement operations

Thought leads action. The U.S. military is good at innovative operational concepts and the concept of electromagnetic spectrum warfare is no exception. The first is to focus on clarifying the concept core and uniting the concept. During the early years of the development of the electromagnetic spectrum warfare, new concepts for the new combat domain were always being demonstrated. The military led high-level forums such as the “Old Ravens” and other professional military and military forums to analyze the related theories involved in the concept, exchange technology development and application methods, and promote deeper understanding. At the same time, in the strategic documents and top-level regulations, the relevant old and new policies were gradually sorted out. The links and distinctions between concepts, and the analysis of their categories and task areas, are increasingly contributing to the clear definition of concepts and the formation of theoretical systems. The second is to use operations on the battlefield, and refine the rules step by step. The U.S. military has always attached importance to the concept of combat to the implementation of warfare and technical measures. It took only about three years from the conception of the electromagnetic spectrum to the entry directives and from the joint directive to the arms and military operational manuals and the TTP. The US Army even established a concept blueprint for the use of battlefields before the Joint Staff. Joint operational and operational guidance for systemic operations at the level of the joint level to the unit level.

3.2 Establish an efficient and integrated force structure based on intrinsic power, and strive to use the full cycle of coordination and order in the battlefield

The troops are the carrier of operations. The U.S. military attaches great importance to the optimization and integration of new concept combat forces and existing capabilities. The first is to focus on the overall planning of the capability system. The trajectory of the capabilities of the US military's electromagnetic spectrum warfare and cyberspace operations is similar. From the Joint Staff Headquarters, the Joint Forces Command to the military arms, set up combat seats and corresponding implementation teams, and establish a full-flow operation mechanism for operational planning, accusation, implementation, and evaluation to form an efficient and smooth capability integration system. The second is to emphasize the coordination and integration of existing institutions and new forces. Through the clarification of the responsibilities and interrelationships of institutions and forces involved in new capabilities in a timely manner, action-oriented operational procedures and implementation procedures are formulated, and even the relevant regulatory templates for coordination activities are promoted to facilitate the whole-system action coordination of electromagnetic spectrum operations and other mission domains. Orderly. The third is relying on actual drills to verify their capabilities in a timely manner. Based on the new concepts of combat and capability goals, the practice of offensive and defensive battles in the field of electromagnetic spectrum is rapidly promoted, and corrections are made during operational trials. The U.S. Army formed an independent electromagnetic spectrum warfare unit of the 1st battlefield network warfare group from February to May last year and plans to participate in an exercise organized by a regional battle commander at the end of the year [31]; the U.S. Air Force is in the "battle shield" exercise. In response to the “Spectrum Interference Elimination Project”, radar EW system evaluation [5] was implemented.

3.3 Promote the pre-research of the new concept equipment system with the support of scientific and technological strength, transform the high technology into the advantage of combat effectiveness

Strong army must have weapon. High-tech equipment is an important way to give birth to newcomer warfare capabilities. The first is to excavate new battlefield changes and assess new demands. The US Department of Defense's "Electromagnetic Spectrum Strategy" in 2014 pointed out that it is necessary to quantify spectrum requirements and develop the equipment and technologies needed for the electromagnetic environment to enhance real-time spectrum operation and electromagnetic spectrum system real-time identification, prediction and interference cancellation capabilities [9]. From the bottom up to the top, the U.S. military has established a demand collection and integration mechanism for the deployment and deployment of equipment systems and applications. It collects and sorts regularly and conducts special investigations and demonstrations with the aid of the government audit department, Rand Corporation, and a special panel of institutes. The analysis results can be Directly providing decision support for the Ministry of Defense and the Joint Staff Association, it forms an unobstructed demand management evaluation system, and injects activators for the development of electromagnetic spectrum warfare equipment and the development of new combat capabilities. The second is to pay attention to the integration of pre-research technology to equipment system applications. The U.S. military equipment system development will be based on national defense information architecture standards. It will have system processes and capabilities such as simulation modeling, pre-research, technology integration, and application verification. It will focus on the simultaneous improvement of existing models and the development of new research and development of smart technology and equipment systems. “Determining Electromagnetic Waves” pointed out that the important features of the electromagnetic spectrum warfare in the new phase are passive sensor applications and the use of “low-zero-power” capabilities to counteract the enemy's anti-electromagnetic confrontation, and intelligent technologies and equipment are the future dominant [6]. The pre-research and integration of electromagnetic spectrum warfare technology and equipment will also be able to achieve a more optimal way to upgrade military capabilities to technological capabilities, integrate cutting-edge technologies with mature methods, and integrate specialized systems into integrated platforms, thus achieving a seamless leap in combat effectiveness.

references

[1] Zhu Song (translation). Electromagnetic spectrum war concept [J]. International Electronic Warfare, 2010(11):26.

[2] US Government Accountability Office. Electronic Warfare: DOD Actions Needed to Strengthen Management and Oversight (GAO-12-479)[R]. WashingtonDC: USGovernment Accountability Office, July 2012: 15.

[3] Li Yu, Ren Xiangyu. Anti-Intrusion/Region Rejection Against R&D of Electronic Warfare Equipment [EB/OL]. (2016-06-20)[2016-06-22]. http://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/hd6w0NMQd0K7wkvzPTHLRg.

[4] US Marine Corps, Navy, Coast Guard. A Cooperative Strategy for 21st Centrury Seapower[R]. WashingtonDC: Department of the Navy, March 2015: 21.

[5] Li Yong translated. The US Department of Defense or declared the electromagnetic spectrum as the sixth battlefield [EB/OL]. (2016-12-22)[2016-12-23]. http://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/E0DW1f6WybyyloAiQK3O3w.

[6] Bryan Clark, Mark Gunzinger. Winning the Airwaves: Regaining America's Dominance in the Electromagnetic Spectrum [R]. WashingtonDC: Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments, 2015-12-02. .

[7] Association of Old Crows. Press Coverage of the 53rd Annual AOC International Symposium & Convention[EB/OL]. (2016-11-29)[2017-01-20]. Http://crows.org/conventions/press-coverage-2016.html.

[8] John Knowles. A Great Strategy [EB/OL]. (2017-06-15)[2017-06-16]. http://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/6_84BjjYnorJrxcRBA41Hg.

[9] US Department of Defense. ElectromagneticSpectrum Strategy[R]. WashingtonDC: Department of Defense, February 2014. Http://.

[10] LCDR J DMcCreary. Gaining the Economic and SecurityAdvantage for 21st Centrury: A Strategy Framework for Electromagnetic Spectrum Control [R]. WashingtonDC: Joint Information Operations Warfare Centre, United Stats Strategic Command, 2010-08-31: 21-22.

[11] Joint Chiefs of Staff. Joint Publication 6-01: Joint Electromagnetic Spectrum Management Operations [M]. WashingtonDC: US ​​Joint Staff, 2012.

[12] Joint Chiefs of Staff. Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Manual 3320.01C: Joint Electromagnetic Spectrum Management Operations in the Electromagnetic Spectrum Operational Environment [M]. WashingtonDC: US ​​Joint Staff, 2012.

[13] Joint Chiefs of Staff. Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Instruction 3320.01D: Joint Electromagnetic Spectrum Operations [M]. WashingtonDC: US ​​Joint Staff, 2013.

[14] Joint Chiefs of Staff. Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Manual 3320.04: Electronic Warfare in Support of Joint Electromagnetic Spectrum Operations [M]. WashingtonDC: US ​​Joint Staff, 2013.

[15] Senate Committee On Armed Serverces. Statement of John E. Hyten Commander United Stares Strategic Command Before the Senate Committee On Armed Serverces [R]. WashingtonDC: US ​​Senate Committee On Armed Serverces, 2017-04-04: 11-12.

[16] US Army Capabilities Integation Center. Training and Doctrine Pamphlet 525-7-16: The United States Army Concept Capability Plan for Electromagnetic Spectrum Operations for the Future Modular Force 2015-2024[M]. WashingtonDC: US ​​Army Training and Doctrine Command, 2007.

[17] US Army Signal Center of Excellence. Field Manual 6-02.70: Army Electromagnetic Spectrum Operations [M]. WashingtonDC: Headquarters, Department of the Army, 2010.

[18] US Army Combined Arms Center & Electronic Warfare Proponent. Field Manual 3-38: Cyber ​​Electromagnetic Activities [M]. WashingtonDC: Headquarters, Department of the Army, 2014.

[19] US Army Cyber ​​Center of Excellence. Army Techniques Publication 6-02.70: Techniques for Spectrum Management Operations[M]. WashingtonDC: Headquarters,Department of the Army, 2015: 1_1-E_1, 5_1-5_12.

[20] US Headquarters, Department of the Army. Army Regulation 525–15: Software Reprogramming for Cyber ​​Electromagnetic Activities[M]. WashingtonDC: Headquarters,Department of the Army, 2016.

[21] US Air ForceElectronic Warfare Division. Air Force Instruction 10-703: Electronic Warfare Integrated Reprogramming [M]. WashingtonDC: Headquarters, Department of the Air Force, 2017.

[22] Joint Chiefs of Staff. Joint Doctrine Note 3-16: Joint Electromagnetic Spectrum Operations [M]. WashingtonDC: US ​​Joint Staff, 2016.

[23] Joint Chiefs of Staff. Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Manual 3320.02D: Joint Spectrum Interference Resolution Prcedures [M]. WashingtonDC: US ​​Joint Staff, 2013.

[24] Joint Chiefs of Staff. Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Instruction 3320.02F: Joint Spectrum Interference Resolution [M]. WashingtonDC: US ​​Joint Staff, 2013.

[25] Joint Chiefs of Staff. Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Instruction 3320.02E-1: Classified Supplement to the Joint Spectrum Interference Resolution Prcedures(U)[M]. WashingtonDC: US ​​Joint Staff, 2014.

[26] Heisey W, KlineW, Zebrowitz H, et al. Automated Spectrum Plan Advisor for On-The-Move Networks [C]. Proceedings of 2006 IEEE Military Communications Conference. WashingtonDC: IEEE, 2007: 1-5.

[27] International Electronic Warfare. Cognition - The future of electronic warfare [EB/OL]. (2016-6-15) [2016-6-17]. http://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/VFKVa7aOg2gDe22X-vfMLQ.

[28] Liu Li translated. The U.S. Joint Electronic Warfare Center seeks to improve the electromagnetic spectrum battle management technology [EB/OL]. (2017-04-01)[2017-04-09]. http://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/narRQTO3-7j4lvHvTcEr7g.

[29] To open up new areas for machine learning applications, DARPA launched the "Radio Frequency Machine Learning System" project [EB/OL]. (2017-08-17)[2017-08-17]. http://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/1y2qYE7MYzcKBVZf5jw5ZQ.

[30] US Joint Chiefs of Staff. Joint Publication 1-02: Department of Defense Dictionary of Military and Associated Terms [M]. WashingtonDC: US ​​Department of Defense, 2011.

[31] Sydne J.Freedberg JR. Army Building 1st Battlefield Cyber/Electronic Warfare Team [EB/OL]. (2016-12-01)[2017-08-20]. Http://breakingdefense.com/2016/12/army-building-1st-battlefield-cyberelectronic-warfare-team.

Wall Box and Outlet

Wall Box And Outlet,Wall Box Outlet,Electrical Box Outlet,Electrical Box Vs Outlet

Huizhou Fibercan Industrial Co.Ltd , https://www.fibercan-network.com